AI Dominance and the Loss of Productive Labor: A Critical Review on the Replacement of Digital Workers in the Era of Technological Globalization

Authors

  • Mohammad Fathi Zidan Muhammadiyah University Prof. Dr. Hamka
  • Iffat Muafi
  • Rifma Ghulam Dzaljad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61536/escalate.v4i02.540

Keywords:

AI Dominance, Digital Worker Replacement, Labor Automation, Employment Data, Instrumental Rationality, Technological Hegemony, Digital Capitalism, Critical Social Theory

Abstract

The expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the digital work ecosystem cannot be separated from the logic of capital accumulation that drives global technology corporations to replace human labor with automated systems. This study aims to critically analyze the phenomenon of the replacement of productive digital workers by AI using the globalization perspective of Anthony Giddens and the critical social theory of the Frankfurt School, with a qualitative approach with a critical paradigm and case study methods through in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, literature studies, and secondary data analysis from the World Economic Forum, the International Labor Organization, Goldman Sachs Research, and the Central Bureau of Statistics. The findings reveal that AI-based automation is not just a technical change, but a systematic disembedding process that removes skills from workers and transfers them to corporate algorithmic systems, as confirmed by global data: projections of the replacement of up to 92 million jobs in 2025–2030 (WEF, 2025), exposure to automation equivalent to 300 million full-time jobs (Goldman Sachs, 2023), with direct implications for more than 145 million Indonesian workers (BPS, 2025). Workers in content writing, design, data analysis, and programming are experiencing a drastic depreciation in the value of their skills while the benefits of automation are concentrated in the hands of a handful of platform owners—a manifestation of instrumental rationality that subordinates human values ​​to the logic of capitalist efficiency, reinforced by a false consciousness that disguises technological dominance as universal progress. This research asserts that responding to AI dominance requires structural resistance: equitable labor regulation, redistribution of automation profits, and reconstruction of education systems that produce critical competencies irreplaceable by machines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716

Agger, B. (2009). Critical social theory: Critique, application, and implications. Discourse Creation.

Central Statistics Agency. (2025). Indonesian employment situation February 2025. BPS RI.

Briggs, J., & Kodnani, D. (2023). The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth (Global Economics Paper). Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

Browne, C. (2020). Critical social theory. Student Library.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.

Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., & Bescond, D. (2023). Generative AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality (ILO Working Paper No. 96). International Labor Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/FHEM8239

Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

International Labor Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital labor platforms in transforming the world of work. ILO.

Jones, P. (2010). Introduction to social theories: From functionalism to postmodernism. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Lubis, AY (2015). Contemporary critical thinking. Rajawali Press.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.

PwC Indonesia. (2024). PwC 2024 Global AI jobs barometer: Indonesia. PwC.

Ritzer, G. (2014). Sociological theory: From classical sociology to recent postmodern developments (8th ed.). Student Library.

Thompson, JB (2003). Ideological analysis: A critique of the discourse of world ideologies. IRCiSoD.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.

Published

2026-07-12

How to Cite

Mohammad Fathi Zidan, Iffat Muafi, & Rifma Ghulam Dzaljad. (2026). AI Dominance and the Loss of Productive Labor: A Critical Review on the Replacement of Digital Workers in the Era of Technological Globalization. Escalate : Economics and Business Journal, 4(02), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.61536/escalate.v4i02.540