Meningkatkan Berpikir Matematika di Sekolah Dasar: Studi Implementasi Metode Inovatif dalam Pembelajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61536/konsienti.v3i01.258Keywords:
Pembelajaran Matematika, Berpikir Matematis, Metode Inovatif, Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah,, Pendekatan InkuiriAbstract
Berpikir matematis merupakan keterampilan kognitif esensial yang harus dikembangkan sejak pendidikan dasar guna meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, analisis, dan berpikir kritis siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi efektivitas metode inovatif dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar, yang mencakup pembelajaran berbasis masalah (Problem-Based Learning/PBL), pendekatan inkuiri, serta integrasi teknologi dalam meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir matematis siswa. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus, penelitian ini mengumpulkan data melalui observasi kelas, wawancara dengan guru dan siswa, serta analisis dokumen pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode inovatif secara signifikan meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual siswa serta keterampilan berpikir analitis dibandingkan dengan metode pembelajaran tradisional berbasis instruksi langsung. Data kuantitatif dari tes diagnostik menunjukkan peningkatan skor yang lebih besar pada siswa yang menggunakan metode inovatif dibandingkan dengan mereka yang belajar melalui metode konvensional. Selain itu, integrasi teknologi dalam pembelajaran memungkinkan siswa memahami konsep matematika yang kompleks secara lebih interaktif dan intuitif. Namun, tantangan dalam implementasi metode inovatif ini meliputi kesiapan guru dalam mengadopsi strategi pembelajaran yang lebih eksploratif serta keterbatasan infrastruktur di beberapa sekolah. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kebijakan yang mendukung pelatihan berkelanjutan bagi guru serta peningkatan akses terhadap teknologi pendidikan guna memastikan efektivitas penerapan metode inovatif dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar.
Downloads
References
Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Teaching skillful teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111413125
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203102564
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future: Policy issues and research needs. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Goos, M. (2014). Creating opportunities for students to develop mathematical reasoning: A sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0087-x
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887331
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. Norton.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9–34.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5263.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dona Ningrum Mawardi, Rani Refianti, Khathibul Umam Zaid Nugroho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
