The Impact of Going Circular: A Financial Analysis of Circular Economy Models for Profitability in the ICT Sector

Authors

  • Sydnei Murphy Creel Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Southern Mississippi
  • Nurul Wardhani Universitas Padjajaran
  • Aspiansyah Statistics Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61536/ambidextrous.v5i02.301

Keywords:

Restorative Justice; Youth Offenders; Recidivism; Accountability; Community Engagement

Abstract

This study explores the impact of community-based restorative justice (RJ) programs on youth offenders by employing a qualitative comparative case study method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, program documents, and observation notes involving participants, facilitators, and community stakeholders. The research investigates how RJ practices influence youth behavior, accountability, recidivism, and reintegration into society. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify recurring patterns in participant experiences and program outcomes. Results show that RJ programs promote emotional healing, reduce recidivism, and strengthen youth-community relations through direct victim-offender engagement and community support mechanisms. Findings highlight the importance of facilitator training, victim involvement, and early intervention in maximizing program effectiveness. The study concludes that restorative justice is a viable and impactful alternative to punitive juvenile systems, offering youth meaningful paths to reform and reconciliation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2015). Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice: Building theory and policy from practice. Routledge.

Beck, E. (2019). Transforming communities: Restorative justice as a community-building strategy. Contemporary Justice Review, 22(3), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1634044

Braithwaite, J. (2018). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Routledge.

Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797

Gavrielides, T. (2020). Restorative justice theory and practice: Addressing the discrepancy. European Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819828618

Hayes, H. (2019). Restorative justice and police practices in Australia. Policing and Society, 29(5), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1445745

Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2019). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 99(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519825510

Liebmann, M. (2018). Restorative justice: How it works. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (2020). Youth justice in New Zealand: Restorative justice in practice? Journal of Social Policy, 49(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000972

McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2018). In pursuit of paradigm: A theory of restorative justice. Restorative Practices eForum.

Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2017). Restorative justice: The evidence. The Smith Institute.

Strang, H., & Sherman, L. (2015). Restorative justice: The evidence. London: Smith Institute.

Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2020). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 104(2), 531–560.

Wong, D. S. W., Cheng, C. H. K., Ngan, R. M. H., & Ma, S. K. (2021). The effectiveness of restorative justice for juvenile offenders: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20939603

Zehr, H. (2021). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Published

2026-08-11

How to Cite

Sydnei Murphy Creel, Nurul Wardhani, & Aspiansyah. (2026). The Impact of Going Circular: A Financial Analysis of Circular Economy Models for Profitability in the ICT Sector. Ambidextrous Journal of Innovation Efficiency and Technology in Organization, 5(02), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.61536/ambidextrous.v5i02.301

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.