Thinner Raw Material Supplier Recommendation System Using a Combination of AHP and TOPSIS Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61536/ambidextrous.v5i02.622Keywords:
Decision Support System, AHP, TOPSIS, Supplier, Web-Based SystemAbstract
The selection of thinner raw material suppliers at CV Tiga Jago needs to be done objectively because procurement decisions are not only influenced by price, but also quality, delivery, stock, payment, and service. This study aims to build a web-based Decision Support System to determine the criteria weights and generate the best supplier recommendations for each thinner raw material. The study uses a quantitative approach with the development of a web-based system through the stages of needs analysis, design, implementation, testing, and evaluation. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method for criteria weighting and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution for supplier ranking. The AHP results show that quality has the highest weight of 0.3794, followed by price 0.2488, delivery 0.1604, stock 0.1024, payment 0.0655, and service 0.0434, with a Consistency Ratio of 0.0199. The TOPSIS results show that the best suppliers are different for each raw material. The system built is capable of managing data, performing AHP-TOPSIS calculations, displaying rankings, graphs, and reports, so that it can help the supplier selection process in a more measurable and documented manner
Downloads
References
Avramova, T., Peneva, T., & Ivanov, A. (2025). Overview of existing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods used in industrial environments. Technologies, 13(10), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13100444
Khatimah, K., & Gustalika, M. A. (2024). Implementation of a decision support system for major selection using AHP and TOPSIS method. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 6(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v6i1.5256
Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2023). A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Sustainable Social Development, 1(1), 2220. https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220
MDN Web Docs. (n.d.). Web technology for developers. Retrieved August 1, 2026, from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web
Petrillo, A., Pamplona Salomon, V. A., & Tramarico, C. L. (2023). State-of-the-art review on the Analytic Hierarchy Process with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(8), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080372
Rivaldi, D., Pulansari, F., & Kartika, A. P. (2023). Analisis pemilihan supplier baut menggunakan metode AHP-TOPSIS PT. Stechoq Robotika Indonesia. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 18(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.18.2.79-87
Sabhira, C. S., Wahyuni, A. T., Septiani, W., & Luis, M. (2024). Decision making for the selection of vegetable suppliers for foods distributors uses AHP and TOPSIS. OPSI, 17(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v17i1.9872
Zahira, N. F., & Pulansari, F. (2023). Pemilihan supplier tebu menggunakan integrasi AHP-TOPSIS pada agroindustri tebu. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 33(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2023.33.3.267
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ananda Diar Eka Putra, Soffa Zahara, Yanuarini Nur Sukmaningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
