Comparison of the Effectiveness of Digital Scrolling and Linear Text on UPI Student Information Retention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61536/ambidextrous.v4i02.501Keywords:
Digital Scrolling, Linear Text, Information Retention, Adaptive CapabilityAbstract
The digital transformation in education has led to a shift in reading formats, impacting cognitive processes and the way students absorb information. This study aims to examine and compare the effect of digital scrolling and linear text presentation formats on the level of information retention among students. This study employed a comparative quantitative method with a between-subject design. The research sample consisted of 20 active students of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bumi Siliwangi Campus, selected using the total sampling technique. The respondents were divided into two treatment groups and evaluated using a questionnaire instrument in the form of a closed-ended objective test with the same reading topic. Data analysis was conducted using the Independent Sample t-test and a robustness test using the Mann-Whitney U test. Descriptively, the research results showed that the linear text group had a higher average retention score (13.30) compared to the scrolling group (12.70). Nevertheless, hypothesis testing confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The effect size test using Cohen's d yielded a value of 0.323 (small-to-medium category), indicating that the linear text format still provides a meaningful practical impact in supporting the reader's working memory due to text segmentation and more stable visual markers. In conclusion, it is assumed that students have equal adaptive capabilities in consuming both digital media formats; however, the linear text format is considered more optimal for reducing cognitive load.
Downloads
References
Azzahra, et al. (2025). Suitability of Learning Media Formats and Tests for Reading Comprehension.
Bresó-Grancha, N., dkk. (2022). Reading digital- versus print-easy texts. Psychological, 43(2).
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Furwana, et al. (2024). Barriers to Digital Book Reading and Cognitive Comfort in Students.
Haverkamp, Y. E., dkk. (2023). Is it the size, the movement, or both? Reading and Writing, 36, 1589–1608.
Kisno, & Sianipar. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Use of Digital Books in Improving Learning Outcomes.
Liu, D. (2024). The effects of segmentation on cognitive load, vocabulary learning and retention. BMC Psychology, 12, 11.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68.
Pahrul, & Marhamah. (2024). The Role of Digital Media in Academic Achievement.
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2009). To scroll or not to scroll. Human Factors, 51(5), 730–738.
Sari. (2025). Learning Media Design Based on Human Cognitive Processes.
Sugiyono. (2021). Communication Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syafrida. (2021). Research Methodology E-Book. Medan: Medan Area University Repository. Accessed from https://repositori.uma.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/16455/1/E-Book%20Metodologi%20Penelitian%20Syafrida.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fahrul Virgias, Aufa Akmal Haadi, Muhammad Aqbil Nashrul Ghaniy, Muhammad Fawwaz Al Fayyadh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










