Analysis of Decision Support Systems Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method to Determine Socioeconomic Inequality Priorities (Case Study: Pelabuhanratu District)

Authors

  • Regina Fazira Slamet Riyadi University
  • Dudih Gustian Slamet Riyadi University
  • Anton Permana Slamet Riyadi University
  • Aat Suwanto Slamet Riyadi University
  • Azizul Azhar bin Ramli Slamet Riyadi University
  • Deden Witarsyah Slamet Riyadi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61536/escalate.v4i4.872

Keywords:

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Decision Support System, Priority Weighting, Socioeconomic Inequality

Abstract

The development of tourism in the UNESCO Global Geopark Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu area has contributed to regional economic growth; However, the benefits have not been equally distributed, resulting in socioeconomic disparities among local communities. This study aims to analyze socioeconomic inequality and determine the priority weight of its influencing indicators using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. A quantitative approach was employed by integrating questionnaire data and online sentiment analysis converted into a Likert scale. Six indicators were used as the evaluation criteria, namely social conflict, land ownership, economic inequality, economic capital ownership, digitalization, and infrastructure. The AHP method was applied to determine the priority weight of each criterion through pairwise comparison and consistency testing. The results show that the Consistency Ratio (CR) is less than 0.10, indicating that the pairwise comparison matrix is ​​consistent and reliable. The weighting results identify the indicators with the greatest influence on socioeconomic inequality in Palabuhanratu District and provide an objective basis for supporting regional development policy decisions. Therefore, the implementation of the AHP method is considered effective in assisting decision-makers in determining development priorities based on socioeconomic inequality indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, R., Greenberg, J., Heffernan, B., Nagatsuma, T., & Rolland, A. (2022). Exceeding octave tunable Terahertz waves with zepto – second level timing noise.

Hubbard, T. L. (2020). Representational gravity: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. 27(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01660-3

Ilhami, M. R., Studi, P., Pemerintahan, I., & Malang, U. M. (2021). Hubungan Antara Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Dengan Community Based Tourism : 6(2).

Imran, & Irwan. (2025). Analisis Dampak Pengembangan Pariwisata terhadap Ekonomi Masyarakat di Desa Lantan Kec, Batukliang Utara, Kab, Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, November.

Iskandar, M. I., Hasibuan, B., & Nahas, A. (2025). Dampak Pembangunan Pariwisata Terhadap Ekonomi dan Budaya Lokal: Tantangan dan Solusi untuk Pengelolaan Berkelanjutan. EKOMA Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi.

Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data , new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. June, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481

Lee, Y., & Jayakumar, R. (2021). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks Economic impact of UNESCO Global Geoparks on local communities : Comparative analysis of three UNESCO Global Geoparks in Asia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.002

Maulana, M., & Adiputra, A. (2023). Analisis Geopark Ciletuh – Palabuhanratu sebagai Daya Tarik Wisata Berbasis Edukasi. Jurnal Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya Dan Perubahan Sosial, 0341.

Muhamad, I. P., Afiq, M., Novita, Y., & Adhi, A. Y. N. (2025). Pengaruh Pengembangan Pariwisata terhadap Ekonomi Lokal di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan , Sumatera Barat. 02(04), 2164–2170.

Octivaningsih, A. R., Sabir, M., & Ladjin, N. (2025). Pengembangan Pariwisata Ekonomi Kreatif Terpadu Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Daerah. 4(1), 6885–6894.

Prabaswara, R., Lemantara, J., & Jusak, J. (2023). Classification of Secondary School Destination for Inclusive Students using Decision Tree Algorithm. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 5(158), 4–7.

Pratama, A. R., Ramadhani, S. N., & Santoso, M. F. (2026). Ketimpangan Sosial dalam Ekonomi Digital: Analisis Multidimensional terhadap Akses dan Inklusi Sosial. PERSEPTIF Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora.

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. 10(2), 56–66.

Zalianti, J. M., & Rahma, Z. Z. (2026). Analisis Ketimpangan Pengembangan Pariwisata Antara Bali Utara Dan Bali Selatan : Studi Kasus Kabupaten Buleleng. Integrasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 4(2), 1144–1157.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

Regina Fazira, Dudih Gustian, Anton Permana, Aat Suwanto, Azizul Azhar bin Ramli, & Deden Witarsyah. (2026). Analysis of Decision Support Systems Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method to Determine Socioeconomic Inequality Priorities (Case Study: Pelabuhanratu District). Escalate : Economics and Business Journal, 4(4), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.61536/escalate.v4i4.872

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.